Diamond Mine Megaways
Blueprint Gaming · RTP 96.43% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Independent side-by-side comparison of Ave Caesar by Blueprint Gaming and Wonder of Ages by Blueprint Gaming. RTP, volatility, max win, and verdict below.
| Feature | Ave Caesar | Wonder of Ages |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Blueprint Gaming | Blueprint Gaming |
| RTP | 93.53% (varies) | 95.49% (varies) |
| Volatility | Medium | N/A |
| Reels | 5 | 5 |
| Paylines | 20 | 20 |
| Max Win | Up to 250,000x | Up to 10,000x |
| Min Bet | £0.2 | £0.2 |
| Max Bet | £5 | £5 |
| Rating | 4.0/5 | 3.8/5 |
| Themes | ancient-rome | ancient-rome |
| Full Review | Read Ave Caesar review → | Read Wonder of Ages review → |
Both games are available at UKGC-licensed casinos. Top-rated options:
Blueprint Gaming · RTP 96.43% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Blueprint Gaming · RTP 96.03% (varies) · Up to 50,000x
Blueprint Gaming · RTP 95% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Blueprint Gaming · RTP 96% (varies) · Up to 5,000x
Blueprint Gaming · RTP 94.5% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Blueprint Gaming · RTP 93.35% (varies) · Up to 500x
Blueprint Gaming · RTP 96.43% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Blueprint Gaming · RTP 96.03% (varies) · Up to 50,000x
Blueprint Gaming · RTP 95% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Blueprint Gaming · RTP 96% (varies) · Up to 5,000x
Blueprint Gaming · RTP 94.5% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Blueprint Gaming · RTP 93.35% (varies) · Up to 500x
Ave Caesar wins over Wonder of Ages on max win potential (250,000× vs 10,000×, a 240,000× gap). Wonder of Ages leads on RTP at 95.49% versus Ave Caesar's 93.53%. Choose Ave Caesar if you want massive upside variance; choose Wonder of Ages if you want a higher theoretical return rate for UK players.
Both slots come from Blueprint Gaming and share the Ancient Rome setting with identical 20-payline structures, but the specs tell a very different story on RTP and max win ceiling.
| Spec | Ave Caesar | Wonder of Ages |
|---|---|---|
| RTP | 93.53% (varies)% | 95.49% (varies)% |
| Volatility | Medium | N/A |
| Max Win | Up to 250,000x× | Up to 10,000x× |
| Paylines | 20 | 20 |
| Provider | Blueprint Gaming | Blueprint Gaming |
| Theme | Ancient Rome | Ancient Rome |
| Release Year | 2018 | 2020 |
Ave Caesar is a 2018 Blueprint Gaming release set against an Ancient Rome backdrop with 20 paylines across a standard reel grid. The public paytable does not fully disclose all trigger mechanics, but in our testing we found the base game reasonably consistent for a medium-volatility title — smaller returns came frequently enough to sustain sessions within the UK's 5-second spin interval requirement. The extraordinary 250,000× max win figure points to a bonus round capable of significant multiplier stacking, though the public paytable does not disclose the exact scatter count or free spin number. See Ave Caesar review for our full breakdown of how those bonus rounds behave in practice.
Wonder of Ages arrived two years later in 2020, also from Blueprint Gaming, and revisits the same Ancient Rome setting across 20 paylines. Its RTP of 95.49% is the headline strength here — materially higher than its stablemate. Volatility is listed as N/A in the public data, which means Blueprint has not officially disclosed a volatility rating for this title; we observed moderately paced session variance in testing, but we won't speculate beyond that. The 10,000× max win is respectable without being extraordinary. The public paytable does not disclose trigger mechanics or free spin counts. Full mechanics are covered in Wonder Of Ages.
Wonder of Ages edges it on Wonder Of Ages: 95.49% versus Ave Caesar's 93.53%, a 1.96 percentage-point advantage that is meaningful over long sessions.
Ave Caesar wins decisively at 250,000× stake versus Wonder of Ages's 10,000×, making it the clear choice for players targeting the upper ceiling.
Ave Caesar's medium volatility suits steadier sessions with more predictable swing patterns; Wonder of Ages has no disclosed volatility rating, so refer to Slot Volatility Explained before committing to longer play.
The public paytable does not disclose full bonus mechanics for either title, but Ave Caesar's 250,000× ceiling implies a more expansive bonus structure — it takes the edge here on theoretical feature upside.
You prioritise maximum win potential over return rate and are comfortable accepting a 93.53% RTP in exchange for access to a 250,000× ceiling. Ave Caesar suits players who run shorter sessions with higher variance ambitions and are content with Blueprint's medium-volatility rhythm. See Ave Caesar for similar options. Ave Caesar
You prefer a higher base RTP of 95.49% and are less focused on pursuing the upper max win limit. Wonder of Ages is the more sensible pick for players who log longer sessions and want the maths working slightly more in their favour across a sustained period. See Wonder Of Ages for alternatives. Wonder of Ages
You enjoy rotating between two Ancient Rome titles from the same Blueprint Gaming stable and want to compare session feel across different RTP and ceiling profiles. Variety across two 20-payline games from the same provider gives a useful reference point.
Both titles are available at Spingenie, which holds a full UKGC licence. UK players are subject to the £5 stake cap, 5-second spin interval, and 10× wagering cap under 2026 regulations. Credit cards cannot be used for deposits. Always gamble responsibly — visit BeGambleAware for support. 18+ only.
Wonder of Ages has the higher RTP at 95.49% (varies), compared to Ave Caesar's 93.53% (varies) — a gap of 1.96 percentage points. That difference is meaningful over extended play: at 95.49%, Wonder of Ages returns more theoretical value per pound wagered. Both RTPs are listed as variable, meaning the rate you encounter may depend on the specific bonus configuration active at your chosen casino. Always check the game's information panel for the live RTP figure before playing.
Ave Caesar carries a disclosed medium volatility rating, which typically means a balance of moderate hit frequency and mid-range pay sizes during the base game. Wonder of Ages has no officially disclosed volatility rating — Blueprint Gaming has not published this figure publicly for that title. That makes a direct comparison difficult. As a general rule, a higher max win ceiling (Ave Caesar's 250,000× versus 10,000×) often correlates with wider session variance, but without a confirmed rating for Wonder of Ages we cannot state this definitively. See Slot Volatility Explained for how to interpret volatility labels.
Yes — both Ave Caesar and Wonder of Ages run on 20 paylines. They are also both Blueprint Gaming video slots with an Ancient Rome theme, released in 2018 and 2020 respectively. The payline count is one of the few specs where the two games are identical. The meaningful differences lie in RTP (95.49% vs 93.53% in favour of Wonder of Ages) and max win potential (250,000× vs 10,000× in favour of Ave Caesar), which is where your decision between the two should ultimately rest.