Sugar Rush Super Scatter
Pragmatic Play · RTP 96.58% · Up to 50,000x
Independent side-by-side comparison of Cookie Bonanza by Armadillo Studios and Sugar Rush 1000 by Pragmatic Play. RTP, volatility, max win, and verdict below.
| Feature | Cookie Bonanza | Sugar Rush 1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Armadillo Studios | Pragmatic Play |
| RTP | 96.17% (varies) | 96.00% (varies) |
| Volatility | N/A | High |
| Reels | 5 | 7 |
| Paylines | Cluster Pays | Cluster pays |
| Max Win | Up to 15,040x | Up to 25,000x |
| Min Bet | £0.2 | £0.2 |
| Max Bet | £20 | £100 |
| Rating | 4.0/5 | 4.8/5 |
| Themes | candy | candy |
| Full Review | Read Cookie Bonanza review → | Read Sugar Rush 1000 review → |
Both games are available at UKGC-licensed casinos. Top-rated options:
Pragmatic Play · RTP 96.58% · Up to 50,000x
Pragmatic Play · RTP 96.49% (varies) · Up to 21,175x
Pragmatic Play · RTP 96.5% (varies) · Up to 5,000x
Pragmatic Play · RTP 96.53% (varies) · Up to 25,000x
Iron Dog Studio · RTP 95.12% (varies) · Up to 5,000x
Pragmatic Play · RTP 96.5% (varies) · Up to 20,000x
Pragmatic Play · RTP 96.47% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Pragmatic Play · RTP 96.7% (varies) · Up to 4,000x
Pragmatic Play · RTP 96.58% · Up to 50,000x
Pragmatic Play · RTP 96.49% (varies) · Up to 21,175x
Pragmatic Play · RTP 96.54% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Pragmatic Play · RTP 96.5% (varies) · Up to 5,000x
Cookie Bonanza wins over Sugar Rush 1000 on RTP (96.17% vs 96.00%, a 0.17 percentage-point edge). Sugar Rush 1000 leads on max win potential at 25,000× stake versus Cookie Bonanza's 15,040×. Choose Cookie Bonanza if you want a marginally better return rate; choose Sugar Rush 1000 if you want the higher ceiling for UK players.
Both slots share a candy theme and cluster-pays mechanic released in 2024, but the specs tell a different story on max win potential and provider pedigree.
| Spec | Cookie Bonanza | Sugar Rush 1000 |
|---|---|---|
| RTP | 96.17% (varies)% | 96.00% (varies)% |
| Volatility | N/A | High |
| Max Win | Up to 15,040x× | Up to 25,000x× |
| Paylines | Cluster Pays | Cluster pays |
| Provider | Armadillo Studios | Pragmatic Play |
| Theme | Candy | Candy |
| Release Year | 2024 | 2024 |
Cookie Bonanza is a 2024 cluster-pays video slot from Armadillo Studios built around a candy Candy grid. Wins form when clusters of matching symbols connect across the reels, with cascading removals extending a single spin into multiple consecutive wins. The public paytable does not disclose specific scatter counts or free-spin trigger thresholds, so we relied on session observation rather than disclosed figures. In our testing, the cluster engine produced frequent small cascades during base play, keeping engagement steady without the prolonged dry spells typical of high-variance titles. The ceiling sits at 15,040× stake. For a deeper mechanic breakdown, see our Cookie Bonanza review.
Sugar Rush 1000 is a 2024 cluster-pays video slot from Pragmatic Play, part of the extended Sugar Rush franchise. It operates on a candy-themed grid where matching clusters tumble away to allow further wins on the same spin. Pragmatic Play rates it as high volatility, which aligns with our testing observations: base-game sessions can run notably dry before a multiplier-charged cascade sequence delivers a concentrated return. The public paytable does not disclose specific free-spin trigger counts or multiplier caps beyond the 25,000× stake maximum win. A buy-bonus option is available in jurisdictions that permit it, though UK regulations apply standard stake-cap rules. Full mechanics are covered in our Sugar Rush 1000.
Cookie Bonanza edges it: 96.17% vs 96.00% from Sugar Rush 1000, a 0.17 percentage-point advantage — see Cookie Bonanza rtp for operator RTP variant details.
Sugar Rush 1000 wins decisively: its 25,000× stake ceiling is 9,960× higher than Cookie Bonanza's 15,040×.
Sugar Rush 1000's disclosed high volatility suits patient players who accept longer losing runs for concentrated returns; Cookie Bonanza's undisclosed volatility rating per Slot Volatility Explained means risk-averse players cannot easily benchmark it against their tolerance.
Sugar Rush 1000 takes this on the strength of its multiplier-accumulation mechanic and buy-bonus availability (where permitted), which the public paytable confirms as distinct features absent from Cookie Bonanza's disclosed spec.
You prioritise a confirmed RTP advantage and prefer a Armadillo Studios cluster mechanic without the heavy variance swings associated with explicitly high-volatility titles. Cookie Bonanza suits players who want more predictable session length and a slightly higher theoretical return on every £1 staked. See Cookie Bonanza for comparable alternatives.
You are comfortable with high volatility and are targeting the 25,000× stake ceiling rather than optimising for RTP. Sugar Rush 1000 suits players who accept dry base-game stretches in exchange for a significantly larger potential single-spin outcome. See Sugar Rush 1000 for comparable alternatives.
You want to contrast two distinct interpretations of the cluster-pays candy format — a steadier RTP-focused session on Cookie Bonanza alongside a higher-variance ceiling hunt on Sugar Rush 1000 from Pragmatic Play.
Spingenie holds a UKGC licence and carries both Cookie Bonanza and Sugar Rush 1000 in its lobby. UK players are subject to the £5 stake cap on higher-volatility titles, the 5-second spin interval, and a 10× wagering cap on any bonus. Please gamble responsibly — visit BeGambleAware for support. 18+ only.
Cookie Bonanza has the higher RTP at 96.17%, compared to Sugar Rush 1000's 96.00% — a gap of 0.17 percentage points. Both figures are subject to operator-level variation, meaning individual casinos may offer lower RTP configurations, so it is worth checking the specific variant available at your chosen site. Over a long session the difference is modest, but Cookie Bonanza holds a measurable theoretical edge on return rate.
Pragmatic Play officially classifies Sugar Rush 1000 as high volatility, whereas Armadillo Studios has not publicly disclosed a volatility rating for Cookie Bonanza. In practical terms, Sugar Rush 1000's high-volatility classification means players should expect longer losing runs punctuated by larger wins, while Cookie Bonanza's risk profile cannot be benchmarked with certainty. If managing bankroll variance is important to you, Sugar Rush 1000's disclosed rating allows for more informed session planning.
Sugar Rush 1000 offers the higher max win at 25,000× stake, compared to Cookie Bonanza's ceiling of 15,040× stake — a difference of 9,960×. Both figures represent theoretical maximums that are extremely rare in practice and are not guaranteed. Sugar Rush 1000's higher ceiling comes paired with disclosed high volatility, meaning the increased potential is offset by a more pronounced risk of extended low-return stretches during a session.